MPS 002 Solved Guess Paper for the 2026 term-end examinations is now ready, and this page shows you exactly what is inside it before you decide. International Relations: Theory and Problems is one of those papers where students read all 35 units, walk into the hall, and still find themselves guessing which five questions to attempt. This guess paper exists to remove that guesswork.
We are not going to pretend a guess paper replaces your books. What it does is narrow a very wide syllabus down to the questions that have actually kept returning across recent sessions, and then hand you answers you can reproduce under exam pressure. Below you will find five complete sample answers, the full question list, the verified exam pattern, and a unit-by-unit index of the whole course.
MPS 002 Guess Paper and Exam Facts at a Glance
MPS-002 is an 8-credit compulsory core course in the Master of Arts (Political Science) programme, examined over 3 hours for 100 marks, and this guess paper answers 13 questions across both sections of that paper. The list below collects every figure you are likely to need.
Quick Reference Facts
- Course code: MPS-002
- Course title: International Relations: Theory and Problems
- Programme: Master of Arts (Political Science), MPS, School of Social Sciences
- Credits: 8 credits, compulsory first-year core course
- Study material: 2 books, 35 units (Book-I: Units 1 to 17, Book-II: Units 18 to 35)
- Exam duration: 3 hours
- Maximum marks: 100
- Paper structure: Section I (Questions 1 to 5) and Section II (Questions 6 to 10)
- Attempt rule: Answer five questions in all, at least two from each section
- Marks per question: 20 marks, answered in about 500 words
- Term-end sessions: June and December
- Questions in this guess paper: 13 questions with complete model answers
- Sample shown on this page: 5 questions with answers, 8 remaining in the full file
- Papers analysed: June 2023, December 2023, June 2024, December 2024, June 2025
- Enquiries: WhatsApp 9899436384
Quick reference facts for the IGNOU MPS 002 guess paper and its term-end examination
What the MPS 002 Solved Guess Paper for 2026 Contains
The file contains 13 questions with full model answers, covering both Section I and Section II of the MPS-002 paper, targeted at the June 2026 and December 2026 term-end examinations. Nine of those answers carry 20 marks each at roughly 450 words, and one is a short-notes question split into two parts of 10 marks each.
The structure follows the way the paper is actually set. Questions drawn from Book-I feed Section I, and questions drawn from Book-II feed Section II, so when you sit down with the paper you can see at a glance that you have enough prepared material to satisfy the "at least two from each section" rule without panicking.
Each answer is laid out the same way: a short definition with a named theorist, three or four headed sub-sections carrying numbered points, and a closing evaluative line. That last part matters more than students expect. A summary that merely repeats the answer earns nothing, while a line that weighs the argument reads like postgraduate work.
If you are collecting material for several papers at once, our broader IGNOU Solved Guess Paper collection covers other course codes in the same format, so you can keep one consistent revision method across your whole first year.
Sample Questions and Answers from the MPS 002 Guess Paper
Five of the thirteen answers are reproduced in full below so you can judge the writing quality before you buy. These are not trimmed teasers. What you read here is what you receive, with the same depth and the same structure carried across the remaining eight questions.
Discuss the key concepts in the realist approach to the study of International Relations.
Meaning of Realism
Realism, also called political realism or realpolitik, is the most influential school for explaining world politics. Its genesis is traced to Thucydides on the Peloponnesian War of 431 BC and to Sun Tzu's The Art of War, though it took modern shape as a reaction against idealism after the Second World War. Realists study the world as it is, treat states as the pre-eminent actors, and ground international relations in power politics and national interest.
Strands of Realism
- Classical Realism runs from Thucydides and Machiavelli to E.H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau, holding that international politics is driven by an endless struggle for power rooted in human nature. Reinhold Niebuhr and Nicholas Spykman belong to this line.
- Contemporary Realism or Neo-realism developed in the 1980s under Kenneth Waltz. It explains outcomes through the anarchic structure of the international system rather than through human nature.
The Three Key Concepts
- National Interest is the most important analytic category. Morgenthau equates it with the pursuit of state power, the minimum requirement being to protect a nation's physical, political and cultural identity against encroachment.
- National Power is identified with political action. For Morgenthau, power is the ability of one actor to control the minds and actions of another.
- National Security is the assurance of the survival of the state, which justifies competitive armaments, alliances and balance-of-power policies.
Important Realist Theories
- Theory of Conflict: conflict is an inevitable feature of an anarchic system in which no central authority enforces order.
- Theory of Balance of Power: states combine to prevent any single power from achieving dominance.
- Theory of Deterrence: security is maintained by a credible threat of retaliation that dissuades an adversary from aggression.
Conclusion: Anchored in national interest, national power and national security, the realist approach remains the dominant framework for explaining the recurrence of conflict and the pursuit of power in an anarchic international order.
What is meant by globalisation? On what basis is the process of globalisation supported and criticised?
Meaning of Globalisation
Definitions of globalisation are plentiful. Some writers give it the broadest possible scope, treating it as a set of phenomena covering rapid communications, market liberalisation and the global integration of production. Others restrict it to economics, viewing it as the increasing interconnection of the markets of different countries through the liberalisation of trade, capital investment and services.
Core Features
- It is a descriptive rather than a prescriptive term, reflecting social, political, economic and technological forces that have become pronounced only recently.
- The term itself is relatively new, though the phenomena it describes are not entirely new.
- It is driven by a communications revolution that allows ideas, information and cultural values to cross national boundaries.
- It carries a strong economic dimension centred on liberalised trade, investment and the diffusion of services.
- It is two-dimensional, working both as an engine of growth and as a force that assaults sovereignty and local culture.
The Basis of Support
- Protagonists argue that globalisation raises economic growth and spreads technology across both the developed and the developing worlds.
- It contributes to better living standards and paves the way towards world prosperity.
- Supporters point to the futility of trying to solve modern problems inside closed national economies.
The Basis of Criticism
- Compromise of national economic interest: integration into global markets erodes a state's control over its own domestic economy.
- Curtailment of national sovereignty: it assaults the sovereign authority of the nation-state and produces a democratic deficit.
- Erosion of national identity: it wears away local culture and tradition, threatening economic and social stability.
Conclusion: Globalisation is a double-edged process, welcomed for spreading growth, technology and prosperity, yet criticised for compromising national economic interest, sovereignty and identity, which is why voices of concern are heard in the developed and the developing world alike.
What are the implications of the New World Order for India? Assess the options available in the given situation.
Meaning of the New World Order
The New World Order emerged from the debris of the old order and was signalled by President George Bush Sr., with the Gulf War against Iraq serving as its marking point. The disintegration of the Soviet Union left the United States as the hegemon of a uni-polar world, with Western Europe, Japan, China and India pushed towards the margins of the new power structure.
Salient Features of the New World Order
- The hegemon: the dominance of the United States, the only nation with worldwide interests, presence and military reach.
- Unilateralism: the United States acts to protect its own interests, often overriding multilateral trade rules and agreements.
- Discriminatory regimes: the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO are used to push liberalisation, privatisation and open trade on the Third World.
- Marginalisation of the UN: the United Nations increasingly becomes an instrument of American foreign policy rather than a centre for harmonising relations.
- Intensifying dependency: with no countervailing bloc, Third World nations are drawn into unequal competition dominated by the G-7 and the multinationals.
Options Available to India
- The client-state option, the soft path: India may follow the Western economic model, embrace consumerism and collaborate militarily, abandoning its long-standing nuclear position.
- The self-reliance option, the hard path: India may pursue self-reliance, nuclear disarmament and peaceful co-existence while reorganising its society and economy.
- The combination, a middle path: India may pick and choose from both, safeguarding vital interests on trade, security, terrorism and Kashmir while building coalitions with other states.
Conclusion: The New World Order confronts India with American hegemony, discriminatory regimes and deepening dependency. India's realistic course lies not in the extremes of client-statehood or absolute self-reliance, but in a pragmatic combination that protects its core national interests.
Discuss the changing nature of American hegemony in the world order.
Meaning of American Hegemony
The contemporary global political system is described by some observers as a uni-polar world. The collapse of the pole represented by the former Soviet Union left the United States as the sole superpower. Analysts do not agree, however, on the exact nature of this unipolarity, and the American position is contested between those who see it as pre-eminent and those who see it as declining.
The Superpower of a Uni-polar World
- The end of the Cold War left the United States as the only superpower, more unipolar than ever before, with unmatched military and economic capability.
- Most Americans perceive their country as the most powerful in the world and favour an active, non-isolationist role.
Competing Assessments of American Power
- Hubert P. Van Tuyll argues that the United States is a declining power that would do well to emulate the British example of survival.
- Timothy Garton Ash describes it as a hyperpower, a term coined by Hubert Vedrine, with matchless soft power and military spending exceeding that of the next eight powers combined.
- Joseph Nye Jr. calls the United States a predominant power rather than a dominant power.
- William Pfaff warns that the American bid for hegemony would eventually fail, because however benevolent it may be, others read it as a threat.
The Strategic Goal
- A section of American opinion supports maintaining the status quo and preventing the rise of any rival centre of power.
- A 1992 Pentagon report concluded that American strategy must refocus on precluding the emergence of any future global competitor.
Conclusion: American power in the world order is both changing and disputed, hailed as a hyperpower yet warned to be a declining and resented one, which reveals that even matchless military and economic strength cannot secure uncontested hegemony over the whole world.
Describe the evolution of the nuclear non-proliferation regime in the post-World War II period.
Meaning of Non-proliferation
Nuclear non-proliferation policy has been concerned mainly with horizontal proliferation, meaning the spread of weapons to new states, rather than with vertical proliferation. It rests on an interplay of two sets of issues: the technical, which denies critical assets or places them under safeguards, and the political, which creates pressure and offers incentives so that capable states choose not to go nuclear.
Four Main Stages of Evolution
- American monopoly: the post-war phase marked by secrecy and by American efforts to retain monopolistic control as the sole nuclear-weapons power.
- Atoms for Peace: the liberal policy ushered in by President Eisenhower and announced at the United Nations in 1953, promoting peaceful nuclear use.
- Controls through safeguards: sponsored by the nuclear-weapon powers and enshrined in the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty of 1968 and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty of 1996.
- The reactive phase: following the Indian test of 1974 and the Indian and Pakistani tests of 1998, this phase produced the Nuclear Suppliers Club, legislation such as the American Nuclear Non-proliferation Act of 1978, and sanctions on new nuclear states.
Technical and Political Components
- The technical component denies or safeguards critical assets so that transferred technology stays in civilian use only.
- The political component works at two levels: international pressure to desist, and incentives or disincentives that dissuade states from going nuclear.
- Capability depends on technology, but it is the political intention to exercise the nuclear choice that finally determines proliferation.
Conclusion: From American monopoly and secrecy, through Atoms for Peace and the safeguards regime of the NPT and the CTBT, to the reactive phase of suppliers' controls and sanctions, the non-proliferation regime evolved as a combined technical and political effort to check the horizontal spread of nuclear weapons.
Reading five answers is usually enough to tell whether a set of solutions is written by someone who has actually opened the IGNOU books. If you want to test the source of these answers yourself, the official course material sits in the eGyanKosh MPS-002 collection, and every claim above traces back to it.
Full Question List Inside the IGNOU MPS 002 Guess Paper 2026
The complete file carries 13 questions. Five are shown above with answers, and the remaining 8 are listed below by title. The titles are listed openly because we would rather you know exactly what you are paying for than discover a mismatch after payment.
| No. | Question topic | Unit mapping | Section | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Examine the post-modernist approach in International Relations | Book-I, Unit 5 | Section I | 20 |
| 7 | Critically examine the feminist view of the state and its relevance to IR | Book-I, Unit 6 | Section I | 20 |
| 8 | What are middle powers and how do they differ from emerging powers | Book-I, Unit 11 | Section I | 20 |
| 9 | Explain the Asian and African approaches to regional cooperation | Book-I, Units 8 and 12 | Section I | 20 |
| 10 | Define self-determination in international relations and discuss its application | Book-II, Unit 18 | Section II | 20 |
| 11 | How is international terrorism different from cross-border terrorism | Book-II, Unit 21 | Section II | 20 |
| 12 | What is meant by diaspora and how does it promote transnational movements | Book-II, Unit 32 | Section II | 20 |
| 13 | Short notes on human security and on China's military modernisation | Book-II, Units 35 and 27 | Section II | 10 + 10 |
Notice the balance. Five questions sit in Section I and eight in Section II across the full set, which means you can walk into the hall holding more than the two-per-section minimum on either side of the paper. That cushion is the whole point of preparing from a guess paper rather than from a random list of important topics.
How We Built the MPS 002 Important Questions from Past Papers
We read five consecutive term-end papers, June 2023 through June 2025, recorded every question against its unit, and then ranked topics by how often they returned. Nothing here was assembled by guesswork or copied from another site's list.
The ranking works on three bands. A topic marked high has either repeated in four or more of the sessions we studied or has been set in the most recent paper, which historically signals a live theme. Medium means it surfaced two or three times. Low means it appeared once and is worth keeping as a backup rather than a priority.
Frequency alone is not enough, though. A topic that appeared in December 2024 and June 2025 back to back is treated differently from one that appeared in June 2023 and then went quiet, because IGNOU does rotate its themes. So we also looked for gaps, meaning strong topics that have been absent for two or three sessions and are statistically due to return. Both signals feed the priority tags in the MPS 002 Solved Guess Paper.
Once the shortlist was fixed, each answer was written against the prescribed unit rather than from general knowledge of international relations. That is why the answers name Morgenthau, Foucault, Laqueur, Keohane and Nye where the books name them. An examiner marking a Political Science script recognises the vocabulary of the course material immediately.
Students who want to run the same exercise themselves can work through our IGNOU Previous Year Question Paper archive, which is where the raw papers behind this analysis came from. It is a slow method, but it teaches you the rhythm of the paper better than any shortcut.
MPS 002 International Relations Theory and Problems Exam Pattern
The MPS-002 term-end paper runs for 3 hours, carries 100 marks, and asks you to answer five questions in all, selecting at least two from each of its two sections. Every question carries 20 marks and is to be answered in about 500 words.
The paper is printed with ten questions. Section I holds questions 1 to 5, drawn from Book-I, and Section II holds questions 6 to 10, drawn from Book-II. One question, usually the first in Section II, is a short-notes question with two parts of 10 marks each. This structure has held steady across recent sessions and can be checked against the official IGNOU MPS-002 question paper hosted on webservices.ignou.ac.in.
A practical point about word limits. Five answers of 500 words each comes to 2,500 words in 180 minutes, and that includes reading the paper and choosing your questions. Most students cannot sustain 500 words per answer at that pace. Roughly 450 well-organised words with clear headings scores better than 600 rushed ones, which is why the answers in this file are written to that length.
Term-end examinations for this course are held in the June and December sessions only. There is no other examination window, so any material advertised for a different month is worth double-checking before you rely on it.
Complete Unit Index of MPS 002 International Relations Theory and Problems
MPS-002 carries 8 credits and is organised into two books holding 35 units in total: Book-I covers Units 1 to 17 and Book-II covers Units 18 to 35. The table below maps every unit to the exam themes it feeds and to its record in the five papers we analysed.
| Book | Unit | Unit title | Key exam themes in this unit | Record in the five papers analysed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book-I (Section I) | 1 | Realist and Neo-Realist Approaches | National interest, national power, national security; Morgenthau on power; Waltz and structural anarchy; balance of power and deterrence | December 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 2 | Liberal and Neo-Liberal Approaches | Liberal assumptions about cooperation, complex interdependence, the role of institutions and regimes | June 2024 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 3 | Marxist and Other Radical Approaches | Class analysis of world politics, imperialism, the world-systems reading of the international economy | December 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 4 | Neo-Radical Approaches | Dependency theory, the centre-periphery model, underdevelopment and unequal exchange | December 2023 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 5 | Post-Structuralist and Post-Modernist Approaches | Foucault on power and knowledge, genealogy and regimes of truth, Derrida on deconstruction and double reading | June 2023, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 6 | Feminist Approaches | Patriarchy and the gendered state, the feminist critique of realist security, Cynthia Enloe on gendered nationalism | December 2023, December 2024 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 7 | Environmental Approaches | Ecology in IR theory, sustainable development, the environment and development debate across the North-South divide | December 2023, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 8 | Worldviews from Asia, Africa and Latin America | Pan-Asianism and the Asian Relations Conference of 1947, Pan-Africanism and Du Bois, Nasser's three circles | June 2023, December 2023 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 9 | End of Cold War | Causes of Soviet collapse, the shift from bipolarity to unipolarity, consequences for the Third World | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-I (Section I) | 10 | Post-Cold War Issues | The widened security agenda, identity conflict, humanitarian questions after 1991 | December 2023, December 2024 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 11 | Emerging Powers | Defining middle powers by position, geography, normative and behavioural criteria; how middle powers relocate as emerging powers | June 2023, June 2024 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 12 | Regional Groupings | SAARC, ASEAN and the European Union; the logic and limits of regional economic cooperation | Appeared only as a short note |
| Book-I (Section I) | 13 | Globalisation | Competing definitions, the case for growth and technology diffusion, criticisms on sovereignty and cultural identity | June 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 14 | International Inequities | The North-South divide, terms of trade, structural inequality in the world economy | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-I (Section I) | 15 | Elements of International Economic Relations | Foreign direct investment against portfolio investment, trade regimes, the roles of the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO | June 2023, June 2024, December 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-I (Section I) | 16 | Management of International Relations | Diplomacy, international law, and the machinery available for managing and settling conflict | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-I (Section I) | 17 | India in the New Global Order | Five features of the New World Order, and India's client-state, self-reliance and combination options | June 2023, June 2024, December 2024 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 18 | Right to Self-Determination | Nationalism and imagined community, Wilson's Fourteen Points, external against internal self-determination | June 2023, December 2024 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 19 | Intervention and Invasion | Humanitarian intervention, the limits of sovereignty, legality and legitimacy of the use of force | December 2023 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 20 | Nuclear Proliferation | Horizontal against vertical proliferation, the four stages of the regime, NPT 1968 and CTBT 1996, suppliers' controls | June 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 21 | International Terrorism | Laqueur's definition, cross-border against international terrorism, Al Qaeda and HAMAS as examples | December 2023, December 2024 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 22 | Role of Science and Technology in International Relations | The technology gap, dual-use technology, technology denial regimes and their politics | June 2024, December 2024 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 23 | Inequality among Nations | The development gap, aid and debt, dependency between rich and poor states | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-II (Section II) | 24 | Global Corporatism and State Sovereignty | Multinational and transnational corporations, erosion of state authority, questions of corporate accountability | Appeared once as a narrow note |
| Book-II (Section II) | 25 | Human Rights and International Trade | Labour and social clauses in trade agreements, the debate on linking rights to market access | Appeared once as a narrow note |
| Book-II (Section II) | 26 | Changing Nature of American Power | Hyperpower against predominant power, Van Tuyll on decline, Nye on soft power, the 1992 Pentagon report | December 2023, December 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 27 | China as an Emerging Power | The Four Modernisations, People's War under modern conditions, hi-tech warfare doctrine, PLA troop reduction | June 2024, June 2025 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 28 | Emergence of Central Asian Republics | Post-Soviet state formation, energy politics, minority questions in the region | Appeared once as a narrow note |
| Book-II (Section II) | 29 | Ethnic Resurgence and Identity Wars | Ethnicity as a political resource, identity conflict, ethnic cleansing and population transfer | December 2023 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 30 | Aboriginal and Indigenous Movements | Indigenous rights, land and resource claims, international instruments protecting indigenous peoples | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-II (Section II) | 31 | Displacement of Population | Refugees and internally displaced persons, intra-state against inter-state displacement | Not set as a full question in these five papers |
| Book-II (Section II) | 32 | Transnational Movements: Cultural and Civilisational | Diaspora and its ties to the homeland, People of Indian Origin, Keohane and Nye on transnationalism, Pravasi Bharatiya Divas 2003 | June 2023, December 2023 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 33 | Role of NGOs | Non-state actors in world politics, NGOs in social development, advocacy and service delivery | Not in these five, but set in June 2022 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 34 | The Concept of Justice in International Relations | Distributive justice between states, global justice debates, fairness in the international order | Not in these five, but set in June 2022 |
| Book-II (Section II) | 35 | Human Security | The individual as the referent of security, intra-state conflict, the risks of unbridled economic globalisation | June 2023, June 2025 |
Use this index as a filter rather than a reading list. If a unit shows two or three appearances in three years and also feeds a question in the guess paper, that unit deserves your evening. If it has not been set as a full question in five sessions, skim it once and move on. Our MPS 002 Study Material notes follow the same unit numbering, so the two can be read side by side.
Who Should Buy This MPS 002 Solved Guess Paper
This file is built for MPS first-year students who have limited time before the term-end examination and need a defensible shortlist rather than the whole syllabus. It suits three situations in particular.
The first is the working student. If you are studying after office hours and can give the paper perhaps ten evenings, reading 35 units is not realistic. Thirteen prepared answers covering both sections is. The second is the repeat candidate who has already sat the paper once, knows the format, and needs sharper, better-structured answers rather than more content.
The third is the student who reads well but writes badly under time pressure. Plenty of MPS candidates understand realism and globalisation perfectly and still lose marks because their answers arrive as unbroken paragraphs with no headings, no theorist named and no conclusion. Seeing thirteen answers in a consistent, marked-up structure fixes that faster than any amount of extra reading.
It is a poorer fit if you are aiming at a distinction and want deep engagement with the theory, or if you still have three months in hand. In that case read the books properly and treat this as a revision layer at the end. We would rather say that plainly than sell you something that does not match where you are.
If you are still mapping out your first year, the course list for IGNOU Master of Arts (Political Science) shows how the four compulsory papers carry eight credits each, which is worth knowing before you decide how to divide your study time between them.
Why Students Choose Unnati Educations for IGNOU MPS 002 Important Questions
Every answer we publish is written against the prescribed IGNOU unit and checked by a reviewer before it reaches a student. That sounds basic, and yet most guess papers circulating for Political Science courses are recycled text with the course code changed.
There is a second difference that matters more at the margin. We tell you what the analysis cannot promise. A guess paper narrows probability, it does not predict a paper. If IGNOU sets three questions from units we ranked low, no amount of frequency analysis would have caught that. What thirteen well-chosen answers across both sections does is make that outcome very unlikely to sink you.
We also keep the writing readable. Postgraduate Political Science material has a habit of becoming impenetrable, and a student reading at eleven at night after a full day at work does not need impenetrable. Short sentences, named theorists, numbered points, clear conclusions.
Students preparing more than one paper this session often pick up the wider MPS Guess Paper set for the rest of the first year, since MPS-001, MPS-003 and MPS-004 follow the same two-section format and reward the same answer structure.
How to Get the Complete IGNOU MPS 002 Guess Paper on WhatsApp
Send a message on WhatsApp to 9899436384 with the course code MPS-002 and your target session, and you will receive the price and payment details along with delivery timing. The complete file is sent after payment as a PDF.
Mention which session you are appearing in, June 2026 or December 2026, and whether you also need material for MPS-001, MPS-003 or MPS-004, since first-year students usually prepare all four together. If you have a doubt about a specific answer after you receive the file, message the same number and we will explain it.
One request before you write in. Please check that MPS-002 is the code printed on your assignment booklet and hall ticket. Political Science course codes look alike, and MPS-002 is specifically International Relations: Theory and Problems in the Master of Arts (Political Science) programme.
Ready to get the complete file? WhatsApp 9899436384 with "MPS-002 guess paper" and your session.
WhatsApp 9899436384Frequently Asked Questions About the IGNOU MPS 002 Guess Paper
The eight questions below are the ones students actually ask us on WhatsApp before ordering the MPS-002 file, answered plainly. If yours is not here, message 9899436384 and ask.
How many questions are inside the IGNOU MPS 002 guess paper for 2026?
The MPS 002 guess paper contains 13 questions with complete model answers. Five of them are reproduced in full on this page as samples, and the remaining eight are listed by title with their unit mapping. Twelve are 20-mark questions of roughly 450 words each, and one is a short-notes question split into two parts of 10 marks. Both Section I and Section II are covered.
Is this MPS 002 guess paper valid for both the June 2026 and December 2026 sessions?
Yes. The MPS 002 guess paper is prepared for both 2026 term-end sessions, because IGNOU conducts examinations for this course in June and December only. The syllabus for International Relations: Theory and Problems does not change between the two sessions, so the same question shortlist and the same answers apply to whichever window you have registered for.
Which units of MPS 002 International Relations does the guess paper cover?
The MPS 002 questions are drawn across both books of the course. From Book-I the paper covers Units 1, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 17, and from Book-II it covers Units 18, 20, 21, 26, 27, 32 and 35. That spread matches the two-section structure of the question paper, so you hold prepared answers on either side of the attempt rule.
Does MPS 002 International Relations have a practical file or project component?
No. MPS-002 is a fully theoretical 8-credit course with no practical file, no laboratory record and no project submission. Your assessment consists of the tutor-marked assignment and the three-hour term-end examination only. The optional dissertation in the MPS programme is a separate second-year course, MPSE-010, and it carries its own credits and its own guidelines.
Will the exact same questions from the MPS 002 guess paper appear in my exam?
No responsible seller can promise that, and we will not. The MPS 002 questions are shortlisted from five previous papers by tracking repetition and gaps, which raises your odds considerably but never guarantees a match. Because you hold thirteen answers spread across both sections, you retain enough choice to build a full attempt even when some questions fall outside the list.
Can the MPS 002 solved answers be copied directly into my assignment?
They should not be. These MPS 002 answers are written for the term-end examination, where reproducing a well-structured answer from memory is exactly what is expected. Assignments are checked differently and are meant to be in your own words. Use these solutions to understand structure and content, then rewrite the assignment yourself to stay clear of any similarity concerns.
Are the MPS 002 answers written in English or in Hindi?
The MPS 002 guess paper is currently prepared in English. IGNOU sets the question paper for International Relations: Theory and Problems in both English and Hindi, and you may write your answers in either medium. If you need Hindi material for this course, message us on WhatsApp at 9899436384 before you order so we can tell you what is available for your session.
How soon will I receive the complete MPS 002 guess paper after payment?
The complete MPS 002 file is a PDF and is sent on WhatsApp shortly after your payment is confirmed, usually within the same working day. Message 9899436384 with the course code and your session to receive the price and payment details first. If you order close to the examination, tell us your exam date so we can prioritise your delivery accordingly.