MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper is a 32-page practical exam guide for IGNOU's Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab. It solves 17 likely lab questions in full: NS-3 programs with topology diagrams for Section A and WEKA procedures with real output for Section B, prepared for the December 2026 term-end practical.
The lab exam rarely throws anything exotic at you. The same tasks keep coming back: a two-node point-to-point link, an OLSR ad hoc network, K-Means on a dataset, a J48 confusion matrix. What decides a pass is whether you can write a working program, draw the topology and show clean output inside one hour. That is what this paper trains you to do.
MCSL 223 Key Facts
- Course: MCSL-223 Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab (2 credits, practical)
- Programmes: IGNOU MCA_NEW and MCAOL, Semester II
- Exam: 2 hours, 50 marks, two sections of 1 hour each
- Marks per section: 20 practical + 5 viva-voce
- Tools: NS-3 (C++) for Section A, WEKA for Section B
- This guess paper: 32 pages, 17 solved questions (9 NS-3, 8 WEKA)
- Shown on this page: 5 sample solutions; 12 more in the full PDF
MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper at a Glance
The paper covers both sections of MCSL-223 in one PDF: 9 NS-3 networking practicals and 8 WEKA data mining practicals, each answered in exam-ready format. Section A answers follow a fixed order of concept, assumptions, topology diagram, program, run steps, output and conclusion. Section B answers follow concept, dataset, WEKA steps, output and interpretation.
MCSL-223 is a Semester II lab course in two programmes. MCA_NEW is IGNOU's standard distance learning (ODL) Master of Computer Applications, and MCAOL is the online variant of the same programme. The lab tasks and exam format are shared, so one paper serves both. If you are clearing theory papers in the same term, our MCA Guess Paper collection lists the other semester courses.
The answers are pitched at what an examiner can actually check in an hour. Programs stay short and commented rather than copying long sample headers. Each output block is taken from a run of that program, so the numbers you see (4.65 Mbps, 96% accuracy, 1098.0 SSE) are results, not guesses.
MCSL 223 Sample Questions with Solutions
Below are 5 of the 17 solved questions, reproduced from the guess paper so you can judge the answer quality before ordering. Three come from Section A (NS-3) and two from Section B (WEKA). The remaining 12 solutions, including the dumbbell cwnd tracing and Apriori tasks, are in the full PDF.
Sample 1 (Section A): Point-to-Point Topology and Throughput While Varying Latency
Create a simple point to point network topology using two nodes. Also, measure the throughput (end to end) while varying latency in the network. Make necessary assumptions.
Assumptions: two nodes n0 and n1 on one 5 Mbps point-to-point link; n0 sends TCP data using an OnOff application and n1 receives it with a PacketSink; link delay is passed on the command line with a 2 ms default; the sender is on from 1 s to 10 s, giving 9 seconds of sending time.
/* Program: Point-to-point network with two nodes.
Purpose: send TCP traffic from n0 to n1 and measure end-to-end throughput. */
#include "ns3/core-module.h"
#include "ns3/network-module.h"
#include "ns3/internet-module.h"
#include "ns3/point-to-point-module.h"
#include "ns3/applications-module.h"
using namespace ns3;
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::string delay = "2ms";
CommandLine cmd (__FILE__);
cmd.AddValue ("delay", "Delay of the point-to-point link", delay);
cmd.Parse (argc, argv);
NodeContainer nodes; nodes.Create (2);
PointToPointHelper pointToPoint;
pointToPoint.SetDeviceAttribute ("DataRate", StringValue ("5Mbps"));
pointToPoint.SetChannelAttribute ("Delay", StringValue (delay));
NetDeviceContainer devices = pointToPoint.Install (nodes);
InternetStackHelper stack; stack.Install (nodes);
Ipv4AddressHelper address;
address.SetBase ("10.1.1.0", "255.255.255.0");
Ipv4InterfaceContainer interfaces = address.Assign (devices);
uint16_t port = 9;
OnOffHelper onoff ("ns3::TcpSocketFactory",
Address (InetSocketAddress (interfaces.GetAddress (1), port)));
onoff.SetConstantRate (DataRate ("6Mb/s"));
ApplicationContainer app = onoff.Install (nodes.Get (0));
app.Start (Seconds (1.0)); app.Stop (Seconds (10.0));
PacketSinkHelper sink ("ns3::TcpSocketFactory",
Address (InetSocketAddress (Ipv4Address::GetAny (), port)));
ApplicationContainer sinkApp = sink.Install (nodes.Get (1));
sinkApp.Start (Seconds (0.0));
pointToPoint.EnablePcapAll ("p2p");
Simulator::Stop (Seconds (11.0));
Simulator::Run ();
Ptr<PacketSink> ps = DynamicCast<PacketSink> (sinkApp.Get (0));
double throughput = (ps->GetTotalRx () * 8.0) / (9.0 * 1000000.0);
std::cout << "Throughput : " << throughput << " Mbps" << std::endl;
Simulator::Destroy ();
return 0;
}
Formula used: Throughput (Mbps) = (total bytes received ร 8) รท (sending time in seconds ร 1,000,000). Run it four times with ./waf --run "p2p-throughput --delay=2ms", then 20ms, 100ms and 300ms.
| Link delay | Throughput | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms | 4.65 Mbps | Close to the 5 Mbps link speed |
| 20 ms | 4.58 Mbps | Small drop, ACKs still quick |
| 100 ms | 4.06 Mbps | TCP window grows more slowly |
| 300 ms | 1.19 Mbps | Long ACK wait cuts throughput sharply |
Conclusion: the two-node network is built with PointToPointHelper, throughput is read from bytes received at the PacketSink, and higher latency gives lower TCP throughput because the sender waits longer for acknowledgements.
Sample 2 (Section A): Wireless MANET with OLSR Routing
Create a wireless mobile ad hoc network using three nodes. Install the Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol. Make necessary assumptions.
Assumptions: three nodes n1, n2, n3 using AdhocWifiMac with YansWifiPhy at a constant 6 Mbps; nodes start 40 m apart in a line and move slowly by random walk; OLSR is set before the stack is installed; n1 sends 5 echo packets to n3 from 20 s so OLSR has time to learn routes.
// Wi-Fi in ad hoc mode (no access point)
WifiMacHelper wifiMac;
wifiMac.SetType ("ns3::AdhocWifiMac");
// Mobility: start in a line, then random walk
mobility.SetMobilityModel ("ns3::RandomWalk2dMobilityModel",
"Bounds", RectangleValue (Rectangle (-20, 200, -20, 20)),
"Speed", StringValue ("ns3::ConstantRandomVariable[Constant=1.0]"));
// Install OLSR as the routing protocol
OlsrHelper olsr;
InternetStackHelper stack;
stack.SetRoutingHelper (olsr); // takes effect on the next Install ()
stack.Install (nodes);
// Save routing tables of all nodes at 15 s
Ptr<OutputStreamWrapper> routes =
Create<OutputStreamWrapper> ("olsr.routes", std::ios::out);
olsr.PrintRoutingTableAllAt (Seconds (15), routes);
Node: 0, Time: +15s, OLSR Routing table
Destination NextHop Interface Distance
10.0.0.2 10.0.0.2 1 1
10.0.0.3 10.0.0.2 1 2
Observation: n1 reaches n2 in one hop, while n3 is out of direct range, so OLSR routes through n2 with a distance of 2. All five echo packets return, which proves multi-hop routing works. The full PDF includes the complete program, topology diagram and pcap step.
Sample 3 (Section A): UdpClient and UdpServer at a Fixed Data Rate
Create a UdpClient and UdpServer nodes and communicate at a fixed data rate. Make necessary assumptions.
Assumptions: n0 is the client and n1 the server on a 5 Mbps, 2 ms point-to-point link; the client sends one 1024-byte packet every 0.01 s from 2 s to 9 s; the server listens on port 4000. The fixed rate works out to 1024 ร 8 รท 0.01 = 819,200 bits per second.
uint16_t port = 4000;
UdpServerHelper server (port);
ApplicationContainer serverApp = server.Install (nodes.Get (1));
serverApp.Start (Seconds (1.0)); serverApp.Stop (Seconds (10.0));
UdpClientHelper client (interfaces.GetAddress (1), port);
client.SetAttribute ("MaxPackets", UintegerValue (1000));
client.SetAttribute ("Interval", TimeValue (Seconds (0.01)));
client.SetAttribute ("PacketSize", UintegerValue (1024));
ApplicationContainer clientApp = client.Install (nodes.Get (0));
clientApp.Start (Seconds (2.0)); clientApp.Stop (Seconds (9.0));
Output: packets received at server 700, packets lost 0. The client ran for 7 seconds at 100 packets per second, and the 5 Mbps link is faster than the sending rate, so nothing is dropped.
Sample 4 (Section B): J48 Classification with Confusion Matrix
Perform classification on any dataset using the J48 algorithm in WEKA toolkit. Show the confusion matrix and accuracy. Make necessary assumptions.
Steps in WEKA Explorer: open the GUI Chooser and click Explorer, load iris.arff in the Preprocess tab, open the Classify tab, choose trees then J48, keep 10-fold cross-validation, click Start, then right-click the result list and pick Visualize Tree. J48 is WEKA's name for the C4.5 decision tree.
| Actual class | Predicted setosa | Predicted versicolor | Predicted virginica |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iris-setosa (50) | 49 | 1 | 0 |
| Iris-versicolor (50) | 0 | 47 | 3 |
| Iris-virginica (50) | 0 | 2 | 48 |
Reading it: rows are actual classes and columns are predictions. The diagonal (49 + 47 + 48) gives 144 correct out of 150, so accuracy = 144 รท 150 ร 100 = 96%. Most of the 6 errors fall between versicolor and virginica, whose petal sizes overlap.
Sample 5 (Section B): Simple K-Means Clustering in WEKA
Implement the Simple K-Means algorithm to demonstrate the clustering process on a dataset. Observe the sum of squared errors and the clusters formed, and visualize the clusters.
How K-Means works: choose K, assign each point to the nearest centre, recompute each centroid as the mean of its points, recheck Euclidean distances and move misplaced points, then repeat until no assignment changes. In WEKA: load vote.arff, open the Cluster tab, choose SimpleKMeans, set K to 6 with Euclidean distance, click Start, then rerun with Classes to Clusters evaluation.
| Item | Value observed |
|---|---|
| Instances | 435 |
| Iterations to converge | 5 |
| Sum of squared errors | 1098.0 |
| Instances per cluster | 168, 47, 37, 122, 33 and 28 |
| Incorrectly clustered (classes to clusters) | 39.77% |
Observation: cluster 0 lines up with republican votes and cluster 3 with democrat votes. Raising K lowers the SSE, and ignoring weak attributes brings the 39.77% error down. In the Visualize tab, pushing Jitter to maximum separates overlapping nominal points.
MCSL 223 Exam Pattern and Marking
The MCSL-223 term-end practical runs for 2 hours with 50 maximum marks, split into two 1-hour sections, each worth 20 practical marks plus 5 viva-voce marks. This matches the header printed on IGNOU's own June 2023 MCSL-223 Set-4 paper.
| Section | Lab | Tool used | Time | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section A | Computer Networks Lab | NS-3 simulator, C++ scripts | 1 hour | 20 practical + 5 viva |
| Section B | Data Mining Lab | WEKA toolkit (Explorer) | 1 hour | 20 practical + 5 viva |
You attempt only the section you have not yet cleared, and every question in that section is compulsory. Each set usually carries one question per section, so a missed topic cannot be skipped. No word limit is printed, but a strong 20-mark answer shows assumptions, a diagram or procedure, the program or settings, and the output.
MCSL 223 Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab Syllabus
MCSL 223 Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab is organised as two lab sections, each built from session-wise practical problems in the IGNOU lab manual. The table maps each session to the tasks the guess paper answers. The official manual is on eGyanKosh.
| Section | Session | Practical focus | Key topics to know |
|---|---|---|---|
| A: Networks | 1 | UdpClient and UdpServer | Fixed packet interval, UdpServerHelper, packet loss count |
| A: Networks | 2 | Two-node point-to-point link | PointToPointHelper, PacketSink, throughput formula |
| A: Networks | 3 | Dumbbell topology with TCP sockets | Bridge link, global routing, ASCII trace events |
| A: Networks | 4 | Mobile ad hoc network | AdhocWifiMac, RandomWalk2d mobility, OLSR tables |
| A: Networks | 5 | UDP over Wi-Fi with plotting | Scheduled recording, GNUPlot, single-device pcap |
| A: Networks | 6 | Ad hoc nodes in 3D space | ListPositionAllocator, GetDistanceFrom, CBR rate |
| A: Networks | 7 | TCP pair and UDP pair on a LAN | CsmaHelper, OnOff over UDP, two-line bytes plot |
| A: Networks | 8 and 9 | Congestion window tracing | CongestionWindow trace source, Rate1 and Rate2 UDP load |
| A: Networks | 10 | Parameterised link with Wireshark | RateErrorModel, DropTailQueue size, Conversations view |
| B: Data Mining | 1 | Installing and exploring WEKA | GUI Chooser options, weather.nominal, histograms |
| B: Data Mining | 2 and 3 | ARFF creation and preprocessing | Excel to CSV to ARFF, Discretize, Resample, attribute ranking |
| B: Data Mining | 3 to 6 | Association rule mining | Apriori, support, confidence, lift, conviction |
| B: Data Mining | 6 | Numeric prediction | REPTree and IBk regression, correlation, RMSE |
| B: Data Mining | 7 and 8 | Classification | J48 tree, Logistic, NaiveBayes, IBk, SMO comparison |
| B: Data Mining | 9 | Clustering | SimpleKMeans, SSE, classes to clusters evaluation |
The manual also names FP-Growth, hierarchical clustering and density-based clustering, but gives little working content for them, so the guess paper treats them as low-priority backups. For chapter-wise theory behind these sessions, see our MCSL 223 Study Material.
MCSL 223 Practical File Index
The full PDF contains 17 practicals: questions 1 to 9 are NS-3 programs and questions 10 to 17 are WEKA tasks, each tagged with a priority level. Use this index as a practical file checklist: tick each program once you have run it on your own system.
| Q | Practical | Program or dataset | Core concept tested | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Point-to-point topology and throughput | p2p-throughput.cc | Throughput falls as link delay rises | High |
| 2 | UdpClient and UdpServer at fixed rate | udp-client-server.cc | Interval and packet size fix the bit rate | High |
| 3 | Dumbbell topology with TCP sockets | dumbbell-tcp.cc | Two TCP flows sharing a 2 Mbps bridge | High |
| 4 | Wireless MANET with OLSR | manet-olsr.cc | Multi-hop route learnt through a relay node | High |
| 5 | UDP over Wi-Fi, bytes plot and pcap | wifi-udp-plot.cc | Linear bytes growth, pcap on one interface | Medium |
| 6 | Ad hoc nodes in 3D with CBR traffic | adhoc-3d-cbr.cc | 30 m fixed distance, 409.6 kbps CBR | Medium |
| 7 | TCP and UDP pairs, monitor and plot | tcp-udp-pairs.cc | TCP handshake delay versus UDP steady slope | Medium |
| 8 | Dumbbell cwnd with UDP Rate1 and Rate2 | dumbbell-cwnd.cc | cwnd collapse when UDP clogs the bridge | Medium |
| 9 | P2P with parameters and Wireshark | p2p-params.cc | Header-inclusive throughput in Conversations | High |
| 10 | J48 classification and confusion matrix | iris.arff | Diagonal sum gives 96% accuracy | High |
| 11 | Predicting numerical values | cpu.arff | IBk beats REPTree on correlation and error | High |
| 12 | Apriori association rules | weather.nominal.arff | Effect of confidence, lift, leverage, conviction | High |
| 13 | Simple K-Means clustering | vote.arff | SSE and cluster sizes at K = 6 | High |
| 14 | ARFF creation and preprocessing filters | weather.csv to weather.arff | Discretize buckets and Resample subsets | Medium |
| 15 | Attribute selection evaluators | Buys-Computers (14 rows) | Age and student ranked top by all evaluators | Low |
| 16 | Five classification algorithms compared | ionosphere.arff | REPTree 89% versus NaiveBayes 82% | High |
| 17 | Install WEKA and explore a dataset | weather.nominal.arff | Class counts play yes 9, no 5 | Medium |
How the MCSL 223 Important Questions Were Chosen
Each of the MCSL 223 important questions was picked by matching past term-end practical papers against the session-wise problems in the lab manual. A topic gets a High tag if it appeared in a recent set, or if it is a core session task that has not been asked lately and is due to return.
The analysis covered five years of IGNOU MCSL-223 practical papers up to the latest December 2025 and June 2026 sets. Some topics clearly repeat: the two-node point-to-point task appears in June 2023 (Set-4) and December 2024, and K-Means clustering was set in June 2023. You can check these sets yourself in our IGNOU Previous Year Question Paper section.
Point-to-point throughput, OLSR, J48 and regression have each shown up in recent sets, which is why they sit at the top of the priority list. Attribute selection has rarely surfaced, so it is marked Low but still solved, because IGNOU does rotate sets and a single surprise question costs 20 marks.
MCSL 223 Practical Exam Study Plan
Six focused days are enough to cover the high-priority MCSL-223 practicals if you run each program yourself instead of only reading it. NS-3 errors usually come from a missing include or a wrong helper order, and you only catch those by compiling.
- Day 1: set up NS-3 and WEKA, then run questions 1 and 2 until both outputs match the paper.
- Day 2: questions 3 and 9, focusing on routing tables, queue size and reading the pcap in Wireshark.
- Day 3: question 4 on OLSR, then question 8 on cwnd tracing, since both test the tracing system.
- Day 4: WEKA questions 10, 13 and 16; practise explaining a confusion matrix and SSE aloud.
- Day 5: questions 11 and 12, and memorise the support, confidence, lift and conviction formulas.
- Day 6: medium and low items (5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 17), plus a timed one-hour mock per section.
Who Should Order the MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper
The paper suits any MCA_NEW or MCAOL learner who has a pending MCSL-223 practical and wants tested programs and WEKA outputs in one place. It is especially useful if you work full-time and cannot attend all 20 practical counselling sessions, or if you failed one section earlier and only need to reattempt that half.
It is not a replacement for running the lab yourself. Examiners check that the code executes, and the viva asks why you chose each setting. Use the paper as your answer model, then practise on your own machine. If you have other courses due, the wider IGNOU Solved Guess Paper range follows the same format.
To order the complete IGNOU MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper, message us on WhatsApp at 9899436384 with the course code. You receive the full 32-page PDF with all 17 solutions, including the 12 not shown on this page.
MCSL 223 Guess Paper FAQs
What is the MCSL 223 guess paper?
The MCSL 223 guess paper is a 32-page study guide for IGNOU's Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab practical exam. It contains 17 likely questions with full solutions: nine NS-3 programs for Section A and eight WEKA tasks for Section B. Each answer includes assumptions, a diagram or procedure, the program or settings, real output and a short conclusion.
Which IGNOU programmes include MCSL 223 Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab?
MCSL 223 Computer Networks and Data Mining Lab is a two-credit practical course in Semester II of IGNOU's Master of Computer Applications. It is taught in MCA_NEW, the standard distance learning version, and in MCAOL, the online version. Both programmes follow the same lab tasks and the same practical exam format, so a single guess paper works for learners in either programme.
What is the exam pattern for IGNOU MCSL 223?
The IGNOU MCSL 223 practical exam lasts 2 hours and carries 50 maximum marks. It has two sections of 1 hour each: Section A is the Computer Networks Lab using NS-3, and Section B is the Data Mining Lab using WEKA. Each section carries 20 marks for the practical and 5 marks for viva-voce. You attempt only the section you have not yet cleared.
How many questions are in the MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper?
The MCSL 223 Solved Guess Paper has 17 questions in total, and every one is solved. Questions 1 to 9 cover Section A NS-3 practicals such as point-to-point throughput, OLSR and cwnd tracing. Questions 10 to 17 cover Section B WEKA tasks such as J48, regression, Apriori and K-Means. This page shows 5 sample solutions, and the other 12 are in the full PDF.
Are the MCSL 223 guess paper programs tested?
Yes. Every NS-3 program in the MCSL 223 guess paper was compiled and run before it was written up, and every WEKA answer uses output from an actual run on the standard datasets. That is why the sample outputs show specific values such as 4.65 Mbps throughput, 96% J48 accuracy and an SSE of 1098.0, which you can reproduce on your own system.
Are MCSL 223 important questions enough to pass the practical?
MCSL 223 important questions cover the tasks most likely to appear, but passing also depends on running the code and handling the viva. Treat the solutions as your model answers, practise each program once on your own machine, and learn why each setting was chosen. Combining the guess paper with the lab manual and past papers gives the safest preparation for both sections.
How can I buy the complete MCSL 223 guess paper?
To buy the complete MCSL 223 guess paper, send a WhatsApp message to 9899436384 mentioning the course code MCSL-223. Our team shares the price and payment details, and after confirmation you receive the full 32-page PDF with all 17 solved questions. If you need guess papers for other MCA courses in the same term, you can ask for them in the same chat.